Encyclopedia of Domestic Assassinations
(The First 1%)
Who killed Bob Marley,
Jim Morrison, Ernest Hemingway, Richard Wright, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X,
Jim Traficant, Leo Ryan, Mark Pittman, Gary Webb, Aaron Swartz, Aaron Russo, Judi
Bari, Pat Tillman . . . and scores of others? Why?
By: The Encyclopedia of Assassination Collective (send
contributions to: aa1674@wayne.edu)
Editors:
Rowan Wolf, Moti Nissani
_____________________
Table of Contents (with internal links)
•
What this Encyclopedia Can and Cannot Prove
•
Jo Cox
•
Charles August Lindbergh Sr.
•
Leo Ryan
•
Bill (Milton William) Cooper
•
Anson Ng
Chapter 4: Minority rights activists
Chapter 5: Environmental Advocates
Chapter 6: Singers-Songwriters
•
Why murder musical celebrities?
Chapter 8: Assassination
Clusters
•
Job Losses, Smears, Incarcerations
·
Comparative longevity of congressional foes and
friends of the Invisible Government
___________________
Encyclopedia of
Domestic Assassinations
Just ere his sinking what does one see
Break on the face of that devotee?
A wakening to the treachery
He had loved with love so blind?
The faith that had shone in that mongrel's eye
That his owner would save him by and by
Turned to much like a curse as he sank to die,
And a loathing of mankind—Thomas Hardy (The Mongrel)
- Celebrates the lives—often
heroic and idealistic—of the Invisible Government’s victims.
- Shows that our real rulers
routinely murder their influential opponents. You might explain away the premature death of
one, or two, or five influential challengers of the Invisible Government,
but you cannot explain away the fact that most of them die early.
- Rattles readers’ cages with Bob
Marley’s question: “How long shall they kill our prophets while we stand
aside and look?”
- Shows that it is utterly futile
to struggle directly for such things as sustainability, peace, justice, or
freedom. Always and everywhere,
humanity's peaceful champions get killed long
before they can accomplish anything. Before doing anything else, we
must overthrow the killers.
What this Encyclopedia Can and Cannot Prove
This compilation cannot prove
involvement of the Invisible Government and its agents in any given case.
To prove or disprove the murder of a single individual requires a book-length
investigation, and even then doubts remain.
Looking at each case in isolation,
one might conclude: “Having reviewed the evidence, I’d say that there is,
say, a 90% chance that the government murdered this particular individual.”
For instance, in the list below, I’d guess that there is only a 5% chance
that the government murdered musician Bobby Darin (who had a weak heart even as
a child), a 98% chance for Martin Luther King (after listening to 70 witnesses,
a jury concluded that the government had a hand in his assassination), and a
99.9% chance for Fred Hampton (who was admittedly murdered by the government).
While this encyclopedia can only
provide probability estimates in any given case, it does provethe
existence of a pattern: If you are influential and meaningfully defy the
Invisible Government, it kills you. The evidence here is statistical in
nature. If you take random samples of 100 smokers and 100 nonsmokers, and
if you see that the lifespan of smokers is significantly shorter, you can
conclude that smoking kills. In the same way, if you take 100 influential
challengers of the Invisible Government and 100 bystanders, and if you see an
even greater longevity gap between them, you can conclude that the Invisible
Government kills.
In fact, it is hard to locate
influential challengers to the Invisible Government who made it to old
age. And, of the few who did, some were reduced
to penury, smeared, or spent time in prison. In the USA, at this moment,
I can only think of 7 such possible survivors, in over a century of assassinations.
The upshot of all this is
simple: Whenever an influential challenger of the Invisible Government
dies, the prime suspect is the Invisible Government. Whenever she is
fired, incarcerated, or smeared, the probable reason is not the officially-stated one, but the threat she posed to the
powers that be.
By the nature of the case, this
encyclopedia cannot meet scholarly standards of accuracy. One cites
internet sources, hoping that they had done their job, but one cannot spend
weeks on researching individual entries. Nonetheless, even in the
extremely unlikely event that only 50% percent of the information presented in
this preliminary draft is accurate (almost certainly over 90% is), that 50%
fully accomplishes the four goals of this encyclopedia.
I have been collecting materials for
an Anglosphere assassination encyclopedia (of domestic victims only), hoping to
compile it alone. I now realize I shall never be able to cover even 5% of
the material on my own. So I decided to post some sketchy entries (the
first 1%?), and invite others to expand and correct
them. I’d also like to invite others to submit new entries (anonymously
or in their own names), following a similar format to the one I have
used. If there is sufficient interest in such a collaborative
undertaking, this encyclopedia will be updated on a
regular basis.
Please send all corrections or new
entries to: <aa1674@wayne.edu> (subject: Encyclopedia).
- A conclusive proof of the cloak-and-dagger hypothesis
is available here: Cloak-and-Dagger
Strategies of Silencing Opponents.
- WikiSpooks—An Encyclopedia of
Deep Politics.
- Carl Sifakis (2013). Encyclopedia of Assassinations.
- Spartacus Educational
“They do not tell the truth; they
are liars! They manipulate our history books.”—Michael
Jackson
Hale Boggs, 1914-1972
(aged 58).
Relevant positions: Representative from Louisiana
(1947-1973); a House majority whip; House majority leader; one of seven members
of the Warren Commission.
Official cause of
death: Airplane accident (his airplane vanished in Alaska
and was never found, 3 others vanished as well: the
pilot, Representative Nick Regich, and Regich’s aide).
Grounds for murder?
- “In April 1971, Boggs made a speech on the floor of the
House in which he strongly attacked FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and the
whole of the FBI.”
- In a conversation with an aide, Boggs said: "[FBI
Director J. Edgar] Hoover lied his eyes out to the
[Warren] Commission – on Oswald, on Ruby, on their friends, the bullets,
the gun, you name it."
- Later that month Boggs went on to say:
"Over the postwar years, we have granted to the elite and secret
police within our system vast new powers over the lives and liberties of
the people. At the request of the trusted and respected heads of
those forces, and their appeal to the necessities of national security, we
have exempted those grants of power from due accounting and strict surveillance."
- “Boggs dissented from the Warren Commission's majority
who supported the single bullet theory. Regarding
the single-bullet theory, Boggs commented, ‘I had strong doubts about
it.’ In the 1979 novel The Matarese
Circle, author Robert Ludlum portrayed Boggs as having been killed to
stop his investigation of the Kennedy assassination.”
- Bernard Fensterwald and Michael
Ewing (Coincidence or Conspiracy?, cited here): “It is a myth that the
Warren Commission was united in its conclusion that a lone assassin killed
President John F. Kennedy. On the seven-member Warren Commission,
there were three dissenters: Senator Sherman Cooper, Senator Richard
Russell, and Congressman Hale Boggs. As Dallas journalist Jim Marrs pointed out, "The most vocal critic among
Commission members [was Hale Boggs]. Boggs became frustrated with the
panel's total reliance on the FBI for information. Speaking of the
'single-bullet theory,' Boggs once
commented, 'I had strong doubts about it.' On April 1, 1971, House
Majority Leader Boggs delivered a blistering attack on [FBI Director] J.
Edgar Hoover, charging that under his directorship the FBI had adopted
'the tactics of the Soviet Union and Hitler's Gestapo.'
- Several years after [Hale Bogg's]
death in 1972, a colleague of his wife Lindy (who was elected to fill her
late husband's seat in the Congress) recalled Mrs. Boggs remarking, 'Hale
felt very, very torn during his work [on the Commission] . . . he wished
he had never been on it and wished he'd never signed it [the Warren Report].'"
- “Richard Russell, Hale Boggs and Cooper believed there
was a conspiracy in the JFK assassination. Russell
and Boggs both said so publicly.” (Richard E. Sprague, Taking
of America).
- “This is somewhat like the position the Warren
Commission took when Richard Russell, Hale Boggs and John Sherman Cooper
refused to sign the draft of the Warren Report until a qualifying
statement was inserted. The statement read,
‘Because of the difficulty of proving negatives to a certainty the
possibility of others being involved with either Oswald or Ruby cannot be
established categorically but if there is any such evidence it has been
beyond the reach of all the investigative agencies and resources of the
United States and has not come to the attention of this Commission.’” (Richard E. Sprague, Taking of America).
- “The Los Angeles Star, on November 22, 1973,
reported that before his death Boggs claimed he had ‘startling
revelations’ on Watergate and the assassination of John F. Kennedy.”
Additional clues
implicating the Invisible Government
- Hale’s widow “expressed doubts about it being an accident.”
_____________
Relevant position:
Member of Parliament, Batley
and Spen, UK, 2015-2016.
Alleged cause of death:
Shot and stabbed by a lone, crazed, assassin.
Grounds for murder?
- “Cox
. . . was an energetic supporter of Britain remaining in the EU.” In turn, the “European Union always was a CIA project”—a
key component in the Invisible Government’s plan of subjugating that continent.
Jon Rappoport explains how Cox’s support of the
Invisible Government on this critical issue might have, paradoxically,
played into the Invisible Government’s hands:
“On June
23rd, the UK will vote on whether to stay in the European Union (the “remain”
campaign) or leave the EU (‘Brexit’). “The polls show a marked shift, with Brexit
supporters gaining. Then a British MP, Jo Cox, who has urged Brits to
remain, is murdered. “The man who is arrested, Thomas Mair, is alleged to have shouted ‘Britain First!’ (Brexit) as he killed Cox. However, now witnesses on the scene are saying they heard
no such thing. “Too late. Social media and news
media are running with the ‘Britain First, Brexit
killer’ narrative. “Here is the psyop formula: “MP Jo Cox wanted to remain in the EU.
Her killer was a ‘Brexit right-wing crazy’ who
yelled ‘Britain First!’ as he murdered her. Therefore,
all people who want Brexit are right-wing crazies.
Therefore, vote to remain in the EU.”
“The sad
death of pro-EU British MP Jo Cox prompted a buying spree in Sterling that
carried on through today as hope sprung eternal that her assassination (and the
efforts to politicize
the actions of a mad man) would lead to either a delayed vote or sympathetic
pro-EU ‘Remain’ swing.’”
“The first
Brexit poll since the killing of Jo Cox suggested
that ‘staying in the bloc won 45 percent support in the . . . telephone poll of
1,001 adults . . . Leaving was endorsed by 42 percent. The poll
marked a reversal of positions from [a] previous survey which was
released just before pro-EU Labour Party lawmaker Cox
was murdered.”
- Cox challenged the Zionist lobby:
“Cox had
only been elected in 2015. As an MP, she was involved with Labour Friends of Palestine and wrote part of a 2015
report by the group, urging a lifting of the Israeli blockade on
Gaza. She said
in February that moves by the Conservative government to use legal
threats to curtail the boycott of Israel were ‘a gross attack on democratic
freedoms. It is our right to boycott unethical companies.’”
Additional clues
implicating the Invisible Government
- See here.
_____________
Bronson Cutting, 1988-1935
(aged 46).
Relevant position: Senator from New Mexico
(1927-1935).
Official cause of
death: Airplane crash (5 of the 8 people aboard were killed).
Grounds
for murder?
- Cutting felt that private banking “was doomed by the
New Deal because government should control money and credit, without the
interference of private banks.”
Cutting wrote:
“The fight
against the abolition of the credit power of private banks will be a savage
one, for their power as a unit is without equal in the country. Knowing
this is why I think back to the events of March 4, 1933, with a sick
heart. For then, with even the bankers thinking the whole economic system
had crashed to ruin, the nationalization of banks by President Roosevelt could have been accomplished without a word of
protest. It was President Roosevelt's great mistake. Now the
bankers will make a mighty struggle.”